Paper detail

Socio-economic models of divorces in different societies

Population dynamic of getting divorced depends on many global factors, including social norms, economy, law or demographics as well as individual factors like the level of interpersonal or problem-solving skills of the spouses. We sought to find such a relationship incorporating only quantitative variables and test theoretical model considering phase transition between coupling (pairs) and free (single) preferential states as a function of social and economic. The analyzed data has been collected by UN across almost all the countries since 1948. Our first approach is followed by Bouchaud's model of social network of opinions, which works well with dynamics of fertility rates in postwar Europe. Unfortunately, we postulate that this pure sociological and pure economic approach fail in general. Thus, we did some observation about why it went wrong and where economy (e. g. Poland) or law (e. g. Portugal) has bigger impact on getting divorce than social pressure.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.