Paper detail

Social optimum in Social Groups with Give-and-Take criterion

We consider a "Social Group" of networked nodes, seeking a "universe" of segments. Each node has subset of the universe, and access to an expensive resource for downloading data. Alternatively, nodes can also acquire the universe by exchanging segments among themselves, at low cost, using a local network interface. While local exchanges ensure minimum cost, "free riders" in the group can exploit the system. To prohibit free riding, we propose the "Give-and-Take" criterion, where exchange is allowed if each node has segments unavailable with the other. Under this criterion, we consider the problem of maximizing the aggregate cardinality of the nodes' segment sets. First, we present a randomized algorithm, whose analysis yields a lower bound on the expected aggregate cardinality, as well as an approximation ratio of 1/4 under some conditions. Four other algorithms are presented and analyzed. We identify conditions under which some of these algorithms are optimal

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.