Paper detail

Sobolev inequalities for the Hardy-Schrödinger operator: Extremals and critical dimensions

In this expository paper, we consider the Hardy-Schrödinger operator $-Δ-γ/|x|^2$ on a smooth domain Ωof R^n with 0\in\barΩ, and describe how the location of the singularity 0, be it in the interior of Ωor on its boundary, affects its analytical properties. We compare the two settings by considering the optimal Hardy, Sobolev, and the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities. The latter rewrites: $C(\int_Ω\frac{u^{p}}{|x|^s}dx)^{\frac{2}{p}}\leq \int_Ω |\nabla u|^2dx-γ\int_Ω\frac{u^2}{|x|^2}dx$ for all $u\in H^1_0(Ω)$, where γ<n^2/4, s\in [0,2) and p:=2(n-s)/(n-2). We address questions regarding the explicit values of the optimal constant C, as well as the existence of non-trivial extremals attached to these inequalities. Scale invariance properties lead to situations where the best constants do not depend on the domain and are not attainable. We consider two different approaches to "break the homogeneity" of the problem: One approach was initiated by Brezis-Nirenberg and by Janelli. It is suitable for the case where 0 is in the interior of Ω, and consists of considering lower order perturbations of the critical nonlinearity. The other approach was initiated by Ghoussoub-Kang , C.S. Lin et al. and Ghoussoub-Robert. It consists of considering domains where the singularity is on the boundary. Both of these approaches are rich in structure and in challenging problems. If 0\in Ω, a negative linear perturbation suffices for higher dimensions, while a positive "Hardy-singular interior mass" is required in lower dimensions. If the singularity is on the boundary, then the local geometry around 0 plays a crucial role in high dimensions, while a positive "Hardy-singular boundary mass" is needed for the lower dimensions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.