Paper detail

SO(3)-monopoles: The overlap problem

The SO(3)-monopole program, initiated by Pidstrigatch and Tyurin [arXiv:dg-ga/9507004], yields a relationship between the Donaldson and Seiberg-Witten invariants through a cobordism between the moduli spaces defining these invariants. The main technical difficulty in this program lies in describing the links of singularities in this cobordism arising from the Seiberg-Witten moduli subspaces. In related articles, we defined maps which, essentially, define normal bundles of strata of these singularities. The link in question is then the boundary of the union of the tubular neighborhoods associated with these normal bundles. However, the SO(3)-monopole program requires the computation of intersection numbers with links where more than one stratum appears in the family of singularities and thus more than one tubular neighborhood appears in the definition of the link. Computations of intersection numbers in unions of open sets have proved difficult for even two open sets, as early work of Leness [arXiv:dg-ga/9603016] and Ozsvath [1994] demonstrated. In this note, we give a brief introduction to our monograph [arXiv:math/0203047], in which we implement these computations.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.