Paper detail

SNR G292.0+1.8: A Remnant of a Low-Mass Progenitor Stripped-Envelope Supernova

We present a study of the Galactic supernova remnant (SNR) G292.0+1.8, a classic example of a core-collapse SNR that contains oxygen-rich ejecta, circumstellar material, a rapidly moving pulsar, and a pulsar wind nebula (PWN). We use hydrodynamic simulations of the remnant evolution to show that the SNR reverse shock is interacting with the PWN and has most likely shocked the majority of supernova ejecta. In our models, such a scenario requires a total ejecta mass of $\lesssim 3\: \rm M_{\odot}$ and implies that there is no significant quantity of cold ejecta in the interior of the reverse shock. In light of these results, we compare the estimated elemental masses and abundance ratios in the reverse-shocked ejecta to nucleosynthesis models and find that they are consistent with a progenitor star with an initial mass of 12-16 $\: \rm M_{\odot}$. We conclude that the progenitor of G292.0+1.8 was likely a relatively low mass star that experienced significant mass loss through a binary interaction and would have produced a stripped-envelope supernova explosion. We also argue that the region known as the "spur" in G292.0+1.8 arises as a result of the pulsar's motion through the supernova ejecta and that its dynamical properties may suggest a line-of-sight component to the pulsar's velocity, leading to a total space velocity of $\sim 600\: \rm km\:s^{-1}$ and implying a significant natal kick. Finally, we discuss binary mass loss scenarios relevant to G292.0+1.8 and their implications for the binary companion properties and future searches.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.