Paper detail

SnapshotNet: Self-supervised Feature Learning for Point Cloud Data Segmentation Using Minimal Labeled Data

Manually annotating complex scene point cloud datasets is both costly and error-prone. To reduce the reliance on labeled data, a new model called SnapshotNet is proposed as a self-supervised feature learning approach, which directly works on the unlabeled point cloud data of a complex 3D scene. The SnapshotNet pipeline includes three stages. In the snapshot capturing stage, snapshots, which are defined as local collections of points, are sampled from the point cloud scene. A snapshot could be a view of a local 3D scan directly captured from the real scene, or a virtual view of such from a large 3D point cloud dataset. Snapshots could also be sampled at different sampling rates or fields of view (FOVs), thus multi-FOV snapshots, to capture scale information from the scene. In the feature learning stage, a new pre-text task called multi-FOV contrasting is proposed to recognize whether two snapshots are from the same object or not, within the same FOV or across different FOVs. Snapshots go through two self-supervised learning steps: the contrastive learning step with both part and scale contrasting, followed by a snapshot clustering step to extract higher level semantic features. Then a weakly-supervised segmentation stage is implemented by first training a standard SVM classifier on the learned features with a small fraction of labeled snapshots. The trained SVM is used to predict labels for input snapshots and predicted labels are converted into point-wise label assignments for semantic segmentation of the entire scene using a voting procedure. The experiments are conducted on the Semantic3D dataset and the results have shown that the proposed method is capable of learning effective features from snapshots of complex scene data without any labels. Moreover, the proposed method has shown advantages when comparing to the SOA method on weakly-supervised point cloud semantic segmentation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.