Paper detail

SNAPSHOT: Connections between Internal and Surface Properties of Massive Stars

We introduce SNAPSHOT, a technique to systematically compute stellar structure models in hydrostatic and thermal equilibrium based on 3 structural properties - core mass $M_{\rm core}$, envelope mass $M_{\rm env}$ and core composition. This approach allows us to connect these properties of stellar interiors to the luminosity and effective temperature $T_{\rm eff}$ in a more systematic way than with stellar evolution models. For MS models, we derive an analytical relationship between $M_{\rm core}$, $M_{\rm total}$ and central H abundance that can be used in rapid stellar evolution algorithms. Core-He burning models with $M_{\rm core}/M_{\rm total}$ from 0.2 to 0.8 have convective envelopes, low $T_{\rm eff}$ and will appear as red supergiants. For a given $M_{\rm core}$, they exhibit a small variation in luminosity (0.02 dex) and $T_{\rm eff}$ ($\sim 400\,\mathrm{K}$) over a wide range of $M_{\rm env}$ ($\sim 2 - 20\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$). This means that it is not possible to derive red supergiant masses from luminosities and $T_{\rm eff}$ alone. We derive the following relationship between $M_{\rm core}$ and the total luminosity of a red supergiant during core He burning: $\log M_{\rm core} \simeq 0.44 \log L/L_{\odot} - 1.38$. At $M_{\rm core}$/$M_{\rm total} \approx 0.2$, our models exhibit a bi-stability and jump from a RSG to a BSG structure. Our models with $M_{\rm core}/M_{\rm total} > 0.8$, which correspond to stripped stars produced by mass loss or binary interaction, show that $T_{\rm eff}$ has a strong dependence on $M_{\rm env}$, $M_{\rm core}$ and the core composition. We find the mass of one of these stripped stars in a binary system, HD 45166, to be less than its dynamical mass. When a large observational sample of stripped stars becomes available, our results can be used to constrain their masses and the physics of binary interaction.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.