Paper detail

SN 2015bp: adding to the growing population of transitional type Ia supernovae

Photometric and spectroscopic observations of type Ia supernova 2015bp are presented, spanning $\sim -6$ to $\sim +141$ days since $B$-band maximum. Also presented are unpublished HCT spectra of type Ia iPTF13ebh between $-11$ to +34 days since $B$-band maximum. SN 2015bp shows rapidly declining light curves with $Δm_{15}(B)=1.72 \pm 0.04$. The $I$-band light curve shows a clear secondary maximum and peaks before the $B$-band maximum, placing SN 2015bp in the transitional category of SNe Ia. The spectral evolution of SN 2015bp resembles other transitional SNe Ia rather than 1991bg-like events. The C~{\sc ii} $λ6580$ feature is detected in both SN 2015bp and iPTF13ebh, though it is present till the epoch of $B$-band maximum in the case of SN 2015bp. The velocity gradients of Si~{\sc ii} $λ6355$ place SN 2015bp and iPTF13ebh in the FAINT subclass, whereas pseudo-equivalent widths of Si~{\sc ii} features place them in the Cool (CL) subclass of SNe Ia. The bolometric light curve of SN 2015bp indicates that $\sim 0.2$ M$_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni was synthesized in the explosion, with a total ejected mass of $\sim 0.9$ M$_{\odot}$, suggesting a sub-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarf progenitor.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.