Paper detail

SN 1986E eight years after outburst: a link to SN 1957D?

We report on the optical recovery of SN~1986E 7.1 and 7.9 years after explosion. The spectra are dominated by broad H$α$ and [O~I] $λλ$6300,6364 emission lines with a minor contribution from [Ca~II] $λλ$7291,7324 and, possibly, [Fe~II] $λ$7155. Compared with the spectra of the other recovered SNII, SN1986E shows strong H$α$ luminosity similar to SN~1979C but, in contrast, weak [O~III] emission. So far, among classified SNe, only type II Linears have been recovered a few years past the explosion. The high optical luminosity of Linear SNII at this phase is most likely related to the interaction of the ejecta with the circumstellar wind which is also expected to produce strong radio emission. Therefore radio observations of the remnant of SN~1986E are worth attempting. The circumstellar interaction model predicts that, in the next decade, the strength of the [O~III]/H$α$ emission rapidly increases and [O~III] $λλ$4959,5007 should eventually dominate the spectrum. We observed this effect in SN~1957D 30 years after explosion which therefore may represent the normal evolution of SNII with a dense circumstellar medium. The details observed in the spectra of both SNe suggest directions for further refinement of the modelling.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.