Paper detail

Smearing of the quantum anomalous Hall effect due to statistical fluctuations of magnetic dopants

Quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAH) is induced by substitution of a certain portion, x, of Bi atoms in a BiTe-based insulating parent compound by magnetic ions (Cr or V). We find the density of in-gap states, N(E), emerging as a result of statistic fluctuations of the composition, x, in the vicinity of the transition point, where the average gap, E_g, passes through zero. Local gap follows the fluctuations of x. Using the instanton approach, we show that, near the gap edges, the tails are exponential, ln N(E) \propto -(E_g-|E|), and the tail states are due to small gap reduction. Our main finding is that, even when the smearing magnitude exceeds the gap-width, there exists are semi-hard gap around zero energy, where ln N(E) \propto -E_g/|E| (ln E_g/|E|). The states responsible for N(E) originate from local gap reversals within narrow rings. The consequence of semi-hard gap is the Arrhenius, rather than variable-range hopping, temperature dependence of the diagonal conductivity at low temperatures.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.