Paper detail

Smaller Is Better: An Analysis of Instance Quantity/Quality Trade-off in Rehearsal-based Continual Learning

The design of machines and algorithms capable of learning in a dynamically changing environment has become an increasingly topical problem with the increase of the size and heterogeneity of data available to learning systems. As a consequence, the key issue of Continual Learning has become that of addressing the stability-plasticity dilemma of connectionist systems, as they need to adapt their model without forgetting previously acquired knowledge. Within this context, rehearsal-based methods i.e., solutions in where the learner exploits memory to revisit past data, has proven to be very effective, leading to performance at the state-of-the-art. In our study, we propose an analysis of the memory quantity/quality trade-off adopting various data reduction approaches to increase the number of instances storable in memory. In particular, we investigate complex instance compression techniques such as deep encoders, but also trivial approaches such as image resizing and linear dimensionality reduction. Our findings suggest that the optimal trade-off is severely skewed toward instance quantity, where rehearsal approaches with several heavily compressed instances easily outperform state-of-the-art approaches with the same amount of memory at their disposal. Further, in high memory configurations, deep approaches extracting spatial structure combined with extreme resizing (of the order of $8\times8$ images) yield the best results, while in memory-constrained configurations where deep approaches cannot be used due to their memory requirement in training, Extreme Learning Machines (ELM) offer a clear advantage.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.