Paper detail

Small-Size Relative (p,Epsilon)-Approximations for Well-Behaved Range Spaces

We present improved upper bounds for the size of relative (p,Epsilon)-approximation for range spaces with the following property: For any (finite) range space projected onto (that is, restricted to) a ground set of size n and for any parameter 1 <= k <= n, the number of ranges of size at most k is only nearly-linear in n and polynomial in k. Such range spaces are called "well behaved". Our bound is an improvement over the bound O(\log{(1/p)/\eps^2 p) introduced by Li etal. for the general case (where this bound has been shown to be tight in the worst case), when p << Epsilon. We also show that such small size relative (p,Epsilon)-approximations can be constructed in expected polynomial time. Our bound also has an interesting interpretation in the context of "p-nets": As observed by Har-Peled and Sharir, p-nets are special cases of relative (p,Epsilon)-approximations. Specifically, when Epsilon is a constant smaller than 1, their analysis implies that there are p-nets of size O(\log{(1/p)}/p) that are \emph{also} relative approximations. In this context our construction significantly improves this bound for well-behaved range spaces. Despite the progress in the theory of p-nets and the existence of improved bounds corresponding to the cases that we study, these bounds do not necessarily guarantee a bounded relative error. Lastly, we present several geometric scenarios of well-behaved range spaces, and show the resulting bound for each of these cases obtained as a consequence of our analysis. In particular, when Epsilon is a constant smaller than 1, our bound for points and axis-parallel boxes in two and three dimensions, as well as points and "fat" triangles in the plane, matches the optimal bound for p-nets.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.