Paper detail

Small hyperbolic 3-manifolds with geodesic boundary

We classify the orientable finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds having non-empty compact totally geodesic boundary and admitting an ideal triangulation with at most four tetrahedra. We also compute the volume of all such manifolds, we describe their canonical Kojima decomposition, and we discuss manifolds having cusps. The manifolds built from one or two tetrahedra were previously known. There are 151 different manifolds built from three tetrahedra, realizing 18 different volumes. Their Kojima decomposition always consists of tetrahedra (but occasionally requires four of them). And there is a single cusped manifold, that we can show to be a knot complement in a genus-2 handlebody. Concerning manifolds built from four tetrahedra, we show that there are 5033 different ones, with 262 different volumes. The Kojima decomposition consists either of tetrahedra (as many as eight of them in some cases), or of two pyramids, or of a single octahedron. There are 30 manifolds having a single cusp, and one having two cusps. Our results were obtained with the aid of a computer. The complete list of manifolds (in SnapPea format) and full details on their invariants are available on the world wide web.

preprint2002arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.