Paper detail

Small Field models with ACTPol and BICEP3 data -- Likelihood analysis

We perform a Bayesian analysis for small field models of inflation, using the most recent datasets produced by Planck`18, ACTPol, and BICEP3. We employ Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to perform analyses with model coefficients, instead of their proxy slow-roll parameters. The ANN connects the models with their projected scalar index $n_s$ and index running $α$, in lieu of the less accurate Lyth-Riotto expressions. We recover the most likely coefficients for a sixth degree polynomial inflationary potential, which yields a tensor-to-scalar ratio $r\lesssim 0.03$. We do so for the case of joint Planck and ACTPol datasets, and for each dataset alone. The BICEP3 data is included in all three analyses. We show that these models are likely, with coefficients that are tuned to about $Δ\gtrsim 1/60$. Curiously, we also find a significant tension between ACTPol and Planck datasets, which we try to account for.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.