Paper detail

Slowdown of interpenetration of two counterpropagating plasma slab due to collective effects

The nonlinear evolution of electromagnetic instabilities driven by the interpenetration of two $e^-\,e^+$ plasma clouds is explored using {\it ab initio} kinetic plasma simulations. We show that the plasma clouds slow down due to both oblique and Weibel generated electromagnetic fields, which deflect the particle trajectories, transferring bulk forward momentum into transverse momentum and thermal velocity spread. This process causes the flow velocity $v_{inst}$ to decrease approximately by a factor of $\sqrt{1/3}$ in a time interval $Δt_{αB} ω_p \sim c/(v_{fl}\sqrt{α_B})$, where $α_B$ is the magnetic equipartition parameter determined by the non-linear saturation of the instabilities, $v_{fl}$ is the initial flow speed, and $ω_p$ is the plasma frequency. For the $α_B$ measured in our simulations, $Δt_{αB}$ is close to $10 \times$ the instability growth time. We show that as long as the plasma slab length $L > v_{fl} Δt_{αB}$, the plasma flow is expected to slow down by a factor close to $1/\sqrt{3}$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.