Paper detail

Slip velocity of lattice Boltzmann simulation using bounce-back boundary scheme

In this work we investigate the issue of non-physical slip at wall of lattice Boltzmann simulations with the bounce-back boundary scheme. By comparing the analytical solution of two lattice models with four and nine discrete velocities for the force-driven Poiseuille flow, we are able to reveal the exact mechanism causing the issue. In fact, no boundary condition is defined by the bounce-back scheme for the the discrete velocities parallel to wall. Other factors, such as initial conditions and inlet and outlet boundary conditions, can play the role and induce the non-physical slip velocity. Therefore, the issue is not related to the single-relaxation-time scheme. Naturally the key for resolving it is to specify the definition for these velocities. Through a lid-driven cavity flow, we show that the solution can be as easy as no extra effort required for simple geometries, although further study is necessary for complex geometries.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.