Paper detail

Slim Disk: Viscosity Prescriptions and Observational Implications

We examine the effects of the different viscosity prescriptions and the magnitude of the viscosity parameter, $α$, on the structure of the slim disk, and discuss the observational implications on accretion-flow into a stellar-mass black hole. For the range of $α= 10^{-2} \sim 10^{0}$ we calculate the disk spectra and from spectral fitting we derive $\Tin$, maximum temperature of the disk, $\Rin$, the size of the region emitting blackbody radiation with $\Tin$, and $p\equiv -{\rm dln} T_{\rm eff}/{\rm dln}~r$, the slope of the effective temperature distribution. It was founded that the estimated $\Tin$ slightly increases as $α$ increases. This is because the larger the magnitude of viscosity is, the larger becomes the accretion velocity and, hence, the more enhanced becomes advective energy transport, which means less efficient radiative cooling and thus higher temperatures. Furthermore we check different viscosity prescriptions with the form of the viscous stress tensor of $t_{r φ} = -αβ^μp_{\rm total}$, where $β$ is the ratio of gas pressure to total pressure, and $μ$ is a parameter ($0 \le μ\le 1$). For $μ=0$ we have previously found that as luminosity approaches the Eddington, $L_{\rm E$, $\Rin$ decreases below 3$\rg$ (with $r_{\rm g}$ being Schwarzschild radius) and the effective temperature becomes flatter, $T_{\rm eff} \propto r^{-1/2}$. Such a slim-disk nature does not appear when $μ$ is large, $μ\sim 0.5$, even at $L_{\rm E}$. Hence, the temperature of the innermost region of the disk sensitively depends on the $μ$ value. We can rule out the case with large $μ~(\sim 0.5)$, since it will not be able to produce a drop in $\Rin$ with an increase in luminosity as was observed in an ultraluminous X-ray source, IC~342, source 1.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.