Paper detail

Slicing Sets and Measures, and the Dimension of Exceptional Parameters

We consider the problem of slicing a compact metric space Ωwith sets of the form π_λ^{-1}\{t\}, where the mappings π_λ \colon Ω\to \R, λ\in \R, are \emph{generalized projections}, introduced by Yuval Peres and Wilhelm Schlag in 2000. The basic question is: assuming that Ωhas Hausdorff dimension strictly greater than one, what is the dimension of the 'typical' slice π_λ^{-1}{t}, as the parameters λand t vary. In the special case of the mappings π_λ being orthogonal projections restricted to a compact set Ω\subset \R^{2}, the problem dates back to a 1954 paper by Marstrand: he proved that for almost every λthere exist positively many $t \in \R$ such that \dim π_λ^{-1}{t} = \dim Ω- 1. For generalized projections, the same result was obtained 50 years later by Järvenpää, Järvenpää and Niemelä. In this paper, we improve the previously existing estimates by replacing the phrase 'almost all λ' with a sharp bound for the dimension of the exceptional parameters.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.