Paper detail

Skyrmion versus vortex flux lattices in p-wave superconductors

p-wave superconductors allow for topological defects known as skyrmions, in addition to the usual vortices that are possible in both s-wave and p-wave materials. In strongly type-II superconductors in a magnetic field, a skyrmion flux lattice yields a lower free energy than the Abrikosov flux lattice of vortices, and should thus be realized in p-wave superconductors. We analytically calculate the energy per skyrmion, which agrees very well with numerical results. From this, we obtain the magnetic induction B as a function of the external magnetic field H, and the elastic constants of the skyrmion lattice, near the lower critical field H_c1. Together with the Lindemann criterion, these results suffice to predict the melting curve of the skyrmion lattice. We find a striking difference in the melting curves of vortex lattices and skyrmion lattices: while the former is separated at all temperatures from the Meissner phase by a vortex liquid phase, the skyrmion lattice phase shares a direct boundary with the Meissner phase. That is, skyrmions lattices never melt near Hc1, while vortex lattices always melt sufficiently close to Hc1. This allows for a very simple test for the existence of a skyrmion lattice. Possible muSR experiments to detect skyrmion lattices are also discussed.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.