Paper detail

Sky Surface Brightness at Mount Graham: UBVRI Science Observations with the Large Binocular Telescope

We present the measurements of sky surface brightness on Mount Graham International Observatory obtained during the first binocular-mode science runs at the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT). A total of 860 images obtained on 23 moonless nights in the period Feb 2008-Jun 2008 were analyzed with our data quality assessment procedure. These data, taken at the solar minimum, show that Mt.Graham, in photometric conditions, still has one of the darkest skies, competing with the other first-class observatories. The zenith-corrected values are 21.98, 22.81, 21.81, 20.82 and 19.78 mag/arcsec^2 in U, B, V R and I, respectively. In photometric conditions, the sky background is ~0.1 mag/arcsec^2 higher than the median when observing toward Tucson and Phoenix but it may be up to ~0.5 mag/arcsec^2 higher in non-photometric conditions. The sky at Mt.Graham is ~0.32 mag/arcsec^2 brighter at airmass ~1.4 than at zenith but no significant trend was found with the time of the night. We demonstrated the dependence of the sky background at Mt.Graham on the solar activity for the first time. In fact in 2008, at B and V bands, the sky was ~0.3 mag /arcsec^2 darker than in 1999-2002. With these results we conclude that Mt.Graham is still a first-class observing site, comparable to the darkest sites in Hawaii, Chile and Canary Islands.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.