Paper detail

Skewness of the Large-Scale Velocity Divergence from Non-Gaussian Initial Conditions

We compute the skewness $t_3$ and the corresponding hierarchical amplitude $T_3$ of the divergence of the velocity field for arbitrary non-Gaussian initial conditions. We find that $T_3$ qualitatively resembles the corresponding hierarchical amplitude for the density field, $S_3$, in that it contains a term proportional to the initial skewness, which decays inversely as the linear growth factor, plus a constant term which differs from the corresponding Gaussian term by a complex function of the initial three- and four- point functions. We extend the results for $S_3$ and $T_3$ with non-Gaussian initial conditions to evolved fields smoothed with a spherical tophat window function. We show that certain linear combinations, namely $S_3 + {1 \over 2} T_3$, $S_3 + T_3$, and $s_3 + t_3$, lead to expressions which are much simpler, for non-Gaussian initial conditions, than $S_3$ and $T_3$ (or $s_3$ and $t_3$) considered separately.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.