Paper detail

Skew-rank of an oriented graph in terms of the rank and dimension of cycle space of its underlying graph

Let $G^σ$ be an oriented graph and $S(G^σ)$ be its skew-adjacency matrix, where $G$ is called the underlying graph of $G^σ$. The skew-rank of $G^σ$, denoted by $sr(G^σ)$, is the rank of $S(G^σ)$. Denote by $d(G)=|E(G)|-|V(G)|+θ(G)$ the dimension of cycle spaces of $G$, where $|E(G)|$, $|V(G)|$ and $θ(G)$ are the edge number, vertex number and the number of connected components of $G$, respectively. Recently, Wong, Ma and Tian [European J. Combin. 54 (2016) 76--86] proved that $sr(G^σ)\leq r(G)+2d(G)$ for an oriented graph $G^σ$, where $r(G)$ is the rank of the adjacency matrix of $G$, and characterized the graphs whose skew-rank attain the upper bound. However, the problem of the lower bound of $sr(G^σ)$ of an oriented graph $G^σ$ in terms of $r(G)$ and $d(G)$ of its underlying graph $G$ is left open till now. In this paper, we prove that $sr(G^σ)\geq r(G)-2d(G)$ for an oriented graph $G^σ$ and characterize the graphs whose skew-rank attain the lower bound.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.