Paper detail

Sketch-Guided Equality Saturation: Scaling Equality Saturation to Complex Optimizations of Functional Programs

Generating high-performance code for diverse hardware and application domains is challenging. Functional array programming languages with patterns like map and reduce have been successfully combined with term rewriting to define and explore optimization spaces. However, deciding what sequence of rewrites to apply is hard and has a huge impact on the performance of the rewritten program. Equality saturation avoids the issue by exploring many possible ways to apply rewrites, efficiently representing many equivalent programs in an e-graph data structure. Equality saturation has some limitations when rewriting functional language terms, as currently naive encodings of the lambda calculus are used. We present new techniques for encoding polymorphically typed lambda calculi, and show that the efficient encoding reduces the runtime and memory consumption of equality saturation by orders of magnitude. Moreover, equality saturation does not yet scale to complex compiler optimizations. These emerge from long rewrite sequences of thousands of rewrite steps, and may use pathological combinations of rewrite rules that cause the e-graph to quickly grow too large. This paper introduces \emph{sketch-guided equality saturation}, a semi-automatic technique that allows programmers to provide program sketches to guide rewriting. Sketch-guided equality saturation is evaluated for seven complex matrix multiplication optimizations, including loop blocking, vectorization, and multi-threading. Even with efficient lambda calculus encoding, unguided equality saturation can locate only the two simplest of these optimizations, the remaining five are undiscovered even with an hour of compilation time and 60GB of RAM. By specifying three or fewer sketch guides all seven optimizations are found in seconds of compilation time, using under 1GB of RAM, and generating high performance code.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.