Paper detail

Size of discs formed by wind accretion in binaries can be underestimated if the role of wind-driving force is ignored

Binary systems consisting of a secondary accreting form a wind-emitting primary are ubiquitous in astrophysics. The phenomenology of such Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton (BHL) accretors is particularly rich when an accretion disc forms around the secondary. The outer radius of such discs is commonly estimated from the net angular momentum produced by a density variation of material across the BHL or Bondi accretion cylinder, as the latter is tilted with respect to the direction to the primary due to orbital motion. But this approach has ignored the fact that the wind experiences an outward driving force that the secondary does not. In actuality, the accretion stream falls toward a retarded point in the secondary's orbit as the secondary is pulled toward the primary relative to the stream. The result is a finite separation or "accretion stream impact parameter" (ASIP) separating the secondary and stream. When the orbital radius a_o exceeds the BHL radius r_b, the ratio of outer disc radius estimated as the ASIP to the conventional estimate a_o^{1/2}/r_b^{1/2}>1. We therefore predict that discs will form at larger radii from the secondary than traditional estimates. This agrees with the importance of the ASIP emphasized by Huarte-Espinosa et al. (2013) and the practical consequence that resolving the initial outer radius of such an accretion disc in numerical simulations can be less demanding than what earlier estimates would suggest.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.