Paper detail

Size Distribution of Small Jupiter Trojans in the L5 Swarm

We present an analysis of survey observations of the trailing L5 Jupiter Trojan swarm using the wide-field Hyper Suprime-Cam CCD camera on the 8.2 m Subaru Telescope. We detected 189 L5 Trojans from our survey that covered about 15 deg^2 of sky with a detection limit of m_r = 24.1 mag, and selected an unbiased sample consisting of 87 objects with absolute magnitude 14 < H_r < 17 corresponding to diameter 2 km < D < 10 km for analysis of size distribution. We fit their differential magnitude distribution to a single-slope power-law with an index α= 0.37 +- 0.01, which corresponds to a cumulative size distribution with an index of b = 1.85 +- 0.05. Combining our results with data for known asteroids, we obtained the size distribution of L5 Jupiter Trojans over the entire size range for 9 < H_V < 17, and found that the size distributions of the L4 and L5 swarms agree well with each other for a wide range of sizes. This is consistent with the scenario that asteroids in the two swarms originated from the same primordial population. Based on the above results, the ratio of the total number of asteroids with D > 2 km in the two swarms is estimated to be N_L4/N_L5=1.40 +- 0.15, and the total number of L_5 Jupiter Trojans with D > 1 km is estimated to be 1.1 x 10^5 by extrapolating the obtained distribution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.