Paper detail

Site testing of the Sierra de Javalambre. First results

We present the main characteristics of the proposed location for the Javalambre Astrophysical Observatory. The measurements have been obtained from spectrophotometric, photometric and seeing data obtained with different monitors and instruments on the site and publicly accessible meteorological satellite data. The night-sky optical spectrum observed in a moonless night shows very little contamination by the typical pollution lines. Their contribution to the sky-brightness is ~0.06 mag in B, ~0.09 mag in V and ~0.06 mag in R. In particular, the comparison of the strengths of the Sodium artificial and natural lines indicates that the site satisfies the IAU recommendations for a dark site. The zenith-corrected values of the moonless night-sky surface brightness are B = 22.8 mag arcsec^-2, V = 22.1 mag arcsec^-2, R = 21.5 mag arcsec^-2, I = 20.4 mag arcsec^-2, which indicates that the site is very dark. The extinction has been measured for the summer period, with a typical value of 0.22 mag in the V-Band, with the best measured value of 0.18 mag in a totally photometric night. The median value of the seeing in the V-band for the last two years (2008-9) is 0.71", with a mode of 0.58". The seeing values present a seasonal pattern, being smaller in summer (~0.69") than in winter time (0.77"). For 68% of the analyzed nights the seeing was better than 0.8" during the entire night. The seeing is found to be stable for rather long periods, in particular for the nights with good seeing values. The typical scale, for nights with the seeing below 0.8", is about 5 hours for variations within 20% of the reference value. The fraction of totally clear nights is ~53%, while the fraction of nights with at least a 30% of the night clear is ~74%.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.