Paper detail

Single-electron shell occupation and effective $g$-factor in few-electron nanowire quantum dots

Nanowire double quantum dots occupied by an even number of electrons are investigated in the context of energy level structure revealed by electric dipole spin resonance measurements. We use numerically exact configuration interaction approach up to 6 electrons for systems tuned to Pauli spin blockade regime. We point out the differences between the spectra of systems with two and a greater number of electrons. For two-electrons the unequal length of the dots results in a different effective $g$-factors in the dots as observed by the recent experiments. For an increased number of electrons the $g$-factor difference between the dots appears already for symmetric systems and it is greatly amplified when the dots are of unequal length. We find that in the lowest energy states all except of two electrons form a frozen core of singlet shells that can be separated away for description of the properties of the system.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.