Paper detail

Single-Atom Catalysis: Insights from Model Systems

The field of single atom catalysis (SAC) has expanded greatly in recent years. While there has been much success developing new synthesis methods, a fundamental disconnect exists between most experiments and the theoretical computations used to model them. The real catalysts are based on powder supports, which inevitably contain a multitude of different facets, different surface sites, defects, hydroxyl groups, and other contaminants due to the environment. This makes it extremely difficult to determine the structure of the active SAC site using current techniques. To be tractable, computations aimed at modelling SAC utilize periodic boundary conditions and low index facets of an idealized support. Thus the reaction barriers and mechanisms determined computationally represent, at best, a plausibility argument, and there is a strong chance that some critical aspect is omitted. One way to better understand what is plausible is by experimental modelling, i.e. comparing the results of computations to experiments based on precisely defined single-crystalline supports prepared in an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) environment. In this article, we review the status of the surface science literature as it pertains to SAC. We focus on experimental work on supports where the site of the metal atom are unambiguously determined from experiment, in particular the surfaces of rutile and anatase TiO2, the iron oxides Fe2O3 and Fe3O4, as well as CeO2 and MgO. Much of this work is based on scanning probe microscopy in conjunction with spectroscopy, and we highlight the remarkably few studies in which metal atoms are stable on low index surfaces of typical supports. In a perspective, we discuss the possibility for expanding such studies into other relevant supports.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.