Paper detail

Simultaneous XMM-\textit{Newton} and HST-COS observation of 1H0419-577: II. Broadband spectral modeling of a variable Seyfert galaxy

In this paper we present the longest exposure (97 ks) XMM-Newton EPIC-pn spectrum ever obtained for the Seyfert 1.5 galaxy 1H 0419-577. With the aim of explaining the broadband emission of this source, we took advantage of the simultaneous coverage in the optical/UV that was provided in the present case by the XMM-Newton Optical Monitor and by a HST-COS observation. Archival FUSE flux measurements in the FUV were also used for the present analysis. We successfully modeled the X-ray spectrum together with the optical/UV fluxes data points using a Comptonization model. We found that a blackbody temperature of $T \sim 56$ eV accounts for the optical/UV emission originating in the accretion disk. This temperature serves as input for the Comptonized components that model the X-ray continuum. Both a warm ($T_{\rm wc} \sim 0.7 $ keV, $τ_{\rm wc} \sim 7 $) and a hot corona ($T_{\rm hc} \sim 160 $ keV, $τ_{\rm hc} \sim 0.5$) intervene to upscatter the disk photons to X-ray wavelengths. With the addition of a partially covering ($C_v\sim50\%$) cold absorber with a variable opacity ($ {\it N}_{\rm H}\sim [10^{19}- 10^{22}] \,\rm cm^{-2}$), this model can well explain also the historical spectral variability of this source, with the present dataset presenting the lowest one (${\it N}_{\rm H}\sim 10^{19} \, \rm cm^{-2} $). We discuss a scenario where the variable absorber, getting ionized in response to the variations of the X-ray continuum, becomes less opaque in the highest flux states. The lower limit for the absorber density derived in this scenario is typical for the broad line region clouds. Finally, we critically compare this scenario with all the different models (e.g. disk reflection) that have been used in the past to explain the variability of this source

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.