Paper detail

Simultaneous Dependence of Matter Clustering on Scale and Environment

In this work, we propose new statistical tools that are capable of characterizing the simultaneous dependence of dark matter and gas clustering on the scale and the density environment, and these are the environment-dependent wavelet power spectrum (env-WPS), the environment-dependent bias function (env-bias), and the environment-dependent wavelet cross-correlation function (env-WCC). These statistics are applied to the dark matter and baryonic gas density fields of the \texttt{TNG100-1} simulation at redshifts of $z=3.0$-$0.0$, and to \texttt{Illustris-1} and \texttt{SIMBA} at $z=0$. The measurements of the env-WPSs suggest that the clustering strengths of both the dark matter and the gas increase with increasing density, while that of a Gaussian field shows no density dependence. By measuring the env-bias and env-WCC, we find that they vary significantly with the environment, scale, and redshift. A noteworthy feature is that at $z=0.0$, the gas is less biased in denser environments of $Δ\gtrsim 10$ around $3 \ h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, due to the gas reaccretion caused by the decreased AGN feedback strength at lower redshifts. We also find that the gas correlates more tightly with the dark matter in both the most dense and underdense environments than in other environments at all epochs. Even at $z=0$, the env-WCC is greater than $0.9$ in $Δ\gtrsim 200$ and $Δ\lesssim 0.1$ at scales of $k \lesssim 10 \ h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$. In summary, our results support the local density environment having a non-negligible impact on the deviations between dark matter and gas distributions up to large scales.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.