Paper detail

Simulations on Consumer Tests: Systematic Evaluation of Tolerance Ranges by Model-Based Generation of Simulation Scenarios

Context: Since 2014 several modern cars were rated regarding the performances of their active safety systems at the European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP). Nowadays, consumer tests play a significant role for the OEM's series development with worldwide perspective, because a top rating is needed to underline the worthiness of active safety features from the customers' point of view. Furthermore, EuroNCAP already published their roadmap 2020 in which they outline further extensions in today's testing and rating procedures that will aggravate the current requirements addressed to those systems. Especially Autonomous Emergency Braking/Forward Collision Warning systems (AEB/FCW) are going to face a broader field of application as pedestrian detection or two-way traffic scenarios. Objective: This work focuses on the systematic generation of test scenarios concentrating on specific parameters that can vary within certain tolerance ranges like the lateral position of the vehicle-under-test (VUT) and its test velocity for example. It is of high interest to examine the effect of the tolerance ranges on the braking points in different test cases representing different trajectories and velocities because they will influence significantly a later scoring during the assessments and thus the safety abilities of the regarding car. Method: We present a formal model using a graph to represent the allowed variances based on the relevant points in time. Now, varying velocities of the VUT will be added to the model while the vehicle is approaching a target vehicle. The derived trajectories were used as test cases for a simulation environment. Selecting interesting test cases and processing them with the simulation environment, the influence on the system's performance of different test parameters will be investigated.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.