Paper detail

Simulations of the Hyades

Context: Using the recent observational data of Röser et al. we present $N$-body simulations of the Hyades open cluster. Aims: We make an attempt to determine initial conditions of the Hyades cluster at the time of its formation in order to reproduce the present-day cumulative mass profile, stellar mass and luminosity function (LF). Methods: We performed direct $N$-body simulations of the Hyades in an analytic Milky Way potential that account for stellar evolution and include primordial binaries in a few models. Furthermore, we applied a Kroupa (2001) IMF and used extensive ensemble-averaging. Results: We find that evolved single-star King initial models with King parameters $W_0 = 6-9$ and initial particle numbers $N_0 = 3000$ provide good fits to the observational present-day cumulative mass profile within the Jacobi radius. The best-fit King model has an initial mass of $1721\ M_\odot$ and an average mass loss rate of $-2.2 \ M_\odot/\mathrm{Myr}$. The K-band LFs of models and observations show a reasonable agreement. Mass segregation is detected in both observations and models. If 33% primordial binaries are included the initial particle number is reduced by 5% as compared to the model without primordial binaries. Conclusions: The present-day properties of the Hyades can be well reproduced by a standard King or Plummer initial model when choosing appropriate initial conditions. The degeneracy of good-fitting models can be quite high due to the large dimension of the parameter space. More simulations with different Roche-lobe filling factors and primordial binary fractions are required to explore this degeneracy in more detail.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.