Paper detail

Simulations of scrape-off layer power width for EAST H-mode plasma and ITER 15 MA baseline scenario by 2D electrostatic turbulence code

The scrape-off layer power width (λ_q) is an important parameter for characterizing the divertor heat loads. Many experimental, theoretical, and numerical studies have been performed in recent years. In this paper, a 2D electrostatic turbulence code, BOUT-HESEL, has been upgraded to simulate H-mode plasmas for the first time. The code is validated against the previous implementation and the experiments. The simulated λ_q is found to agree quite well with the Eich scaling for the EAST H-mode discharge. The code is utilized to simulate the ITER 15MA baseline scenario. The ITER simulation reveals that the radial particle/heat transports are dominated by blobby transports, and predicts λ_{q,ITER} = 9.6 mm, which is much larger than the prediction by the Eich scaling. Based on the EAST modified cases, an estimated HESEL H-mode scaling, λ_q=0.51R_c^1.1B_t^(-0.3)q_95^1.1 is proposed. This scaling predicts λ_{q,ITER} = 9.3 mm, which agrees surprisingly well with that for the ITER case. A further investigation combined with the basic parameters in the database of the Eich scaling shows that the missing positive scaling dependence on the machine size (Rc) in the Eich scaling appears to be shaded by the negative scaling dependence on the toroidal magnetic field (Bt) for current devices. This is however not the case for ITER, explaining why simulations in recent studies and in this paper can reproduce the Eich scaling for current devices, but predict a much larger λ_q for ITER. According to the simulation results, the strong positive scaling dependence of λ_q on Rc is due to a combination of slowing down the parallel heat transports by increasing the parallel connection length and the enhancement of the radial ExB turbulent heat transports when the machine size is increased.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.