Paper detail

Simulations of fully convective M dwarfs: dynamo action with varying magnetic Prandtl numbers

M dwarfs are low-mass main-sequence stars, the most numerous type of stars in the solar neighbourhood, which are known to have significant magnetic activity. The aim of this work is to explore the dynamo solutions and magnetic fields of fully convective M dwarfs with varying magnetic Prandtl numbers ${\rm Pr_M}$, and a rotation period (${\rm P_{rot}}$) of 43 days. ${\rm Pr_M}$ is known to play an important role in the dynamo action; dynamos for low-$\rm Pr_M$ and large-$\rm Pr_M$ have very different properties. We performed three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) numerical simulations with the ``star-in-a-box'' model using stellar parameters for an M5 dwarf with $0.21 M_{\odot}$. We found that the dynamo solutions are sensitive to ${\rm Pr_M}$. The simulations at this rotation period present periodic cycles of the large-scale magnetic field up to ${\rm Pr_M} \leq 2$; for higher values the cycles disappear and irregular solutions to arise. Our results are consistent with previous studies and suggest that the dynamos operating in fully convective stars behave similarly as those in partially convective stars.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.