Paper detail

Simulation Study of a Positive Ionospheric Storm Phase Observed at Millstone Hill

Simulation results from the NRL ionospheric model SAMI2 indicate that the changes in the F-region over Millstone Hill during the geomagnetic storm beginning on 3 April 2004 are primarily due to the influence of a long-lasting eastward electric field, as was previously suggested by {\it Huang et al.} [2005]. A simulation of the storm day agrees well with the observational data and shows that, compared with the ionosphere of the previous quiet day, the peak electron density in the F-region (NmF2) increased by a factor of $\approx 2$, the altitude of the peak density (hmF2) rose by $\approx 80$ km, and the F-region electron temperature decreased by $\approx 1000$ K. Further simulations in which either the neutral atmosphere and winds or the electric field were replaced by their quiet day counterparts clearly suggest that the electric field played the dominant, although not exclusive, role in producing these effects.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.