Paper detail

Simulation of runaway electron generation in fusion grade tokamak and suppression by impurity injection

During disruptions in fusion-grade tokamaks like ITER, large electric fields are induced following the thermal quench (TQ) period which can generate a substantial amount of Runaway Electrons (REs) that can carry up to 10 MA current with energies as high as several tens of MeV [1-3] in current quench phase (CQ). These runaway electrons can cause significant damage to the plasma-facing-components due to their localized energy deposition. To mitigate these effects, impurity injections of high-Z atoms have been proposed [1-3]. In this paper, we use a self-consistent 0D tokamak disruption model as implemented in PREDICT code [6] which has been upgraded to take into account the effect of impurity injections on RE dynamics as suggested in [4-5]. Dominant RE generation mechanisms such as the secondary avalanche mechanism as well as primary RE-generation mechanisms namely Dreicer, hot-tail, tritium decay and Compton scattering (from γ-rays emitted from activated walls) have been taken into account. In these simulations, the effect of impurities is taken into account considering collisions of REs with free and bound electrons as well as scattering from full and partially-shielded nuclear charge. These corrections were also implemented in the relativistic test particle model to simulate RE-dynamics in momentum space. We show that the presence of impurities has a non-uniform effect on the Runaway Electron Distribution function. We also show that the combined effect of pitch-angle scattering induced by the collisions with impurity ions and synchrotron emission loss results in the faster dissipation of RE-energy distribution function [7]. The variation of different RE generation mechanisms during different phases of the disruption, mainly before and after impurity injections is reported.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.