Paper detail

Simulating X-ray Supercavities and Their Impact on Galaxy Clusters

Recent X-ray observations of hot gas in the galaxy cluster MS 0735.6+7421 reveal huge radio-bright, quasi-bipolar X-ray cavities having a total energy ~10^{62} ergs, the most energetic AGN outburst currently known. We investigate the evolution of this outburst with two-dimensional axisymmetric gasdynamical calculations in which the cavities are inflated by relativistic cosmic rays. Many key observational features of the cavities and associated shocks are successfully reproduced. The radial elongation of the cavities indicates that cosmic rays were injected into the cluster gas by a (jet) source moving out from the central AGN. AGN jets of this magnitude must be almost perfectly identically bipolar. The relativistic momentum of a single jet would cause a central AGN black hole of mass 10^9 M_{sun} to recoil at ~6000 km s^{-1}, exceeding kick velocities during black hole mergers, and be ejected from the cluster-center galaxy. When the cavity inflation is complete, 4PV underestimates the total energy received by the cluster gas. Deviations of the cluster gas from hydrostatic equilibrium are most pronounced during the early cavity evolution when the integrated cluster mass found from the observed gas pressure gradient can have systematic errors near the cavities of ~10-30%. The creation of the cavity with cosmic rays generates a long-lasting global cluster expansion that reduces the total gas thermal energy below that received from the cavity shock. One Gyr after this single outburst, a gas mass of ~ 6 \times 10^{11} M_{sun} is transported out beyond a cluster radius of 500 kpc. Such post-cavity outflows can naturally produce the discrepancy observed between the cluster gas mass fraction and the universal baryon fraction inferred from WMAP observations. (Abridged)

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.