Paper detail

Simulating the Universe with MICE: The abundance of massive clusters

We introduce a new set of large N-body runs, the MICE simulations, that provide a unique combination of very large cosmological volumes with good mass resolution. They follow the gravitational evolution of ~ 8.5 billion particles (2048^3) in volumes covering up to 450 (Gpc/h)^3. Our main goal is to accurately model and calibrate basic cosmological probes that will be used by upcoming astronomical surveys. Here we take advantage of the very large volumes of MICE to make a robust sampling of the high-mass tail of the halo mass function (MF). We discuss and avoid possible systematic effects in our study, and do a detailed analysis of different error estimators. We find that available fits to the local abundance of halos (Warren et al. (2006)) match well the abundance in MICE up to M ~ 10^{14}\Msun, but significantly deviate for larger masses, underestimating the mass function by 10% (30%) at M = 3.16 x 10^{14}\Msun (10^{15}\Msun). Similarly, the widely used Sheth & Tormen (1999) fit, if extrapolated to high redshift assuming universality, leads to an underestimation of the cluster abundance by 30%, 20% and 15% at z=0, 0.5, 1 for M ~ [7 - 2.5 - 0.8] x 10^{14}\Msun respectively ($ν= δ_c/σ~ 3$). We provide a re-calibration of the halo MF valid over 5 orders of magnitude in mass, 10^{10} < M/(\Msun) < 10^{15}, that accurately describes its redshift evolution up to z=1. We explore the impact of this re-calibration on the determination of dark-energy, and conclude that using available fits may systematically bias the estimate of w by as much as 50% for medium-depth (z <= 1) surveys. MICE halo catalogues are publicly available at http://www.ice.cat/mice

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.