Paper detail

Simulating the formation of massive seed black holes in the early Universe. III: The influence of X-rays

The direct collapse black hole (DCBH) model attempts to explain the observed number density of supermassive black holes in the early Universe by positing that they grew from seed black holes with masses of $10^{4}$-$10^{5} \: {\rm M_{\odot}}$ that formed by the quasi-isothermal collapse of gas in metal-free protogalaxies cooled by atomic hydrogen emission. For this model to work, H$_{2}$ formation must be suppressed in at least some of these systems by a strong extragalactic radiation field. The predicted number density of DCBH seeds is highly sensitive to the minimum value of the ultraviolet (UV) flux required to suppress H$_{2}$ formation, $J_{\rm crit}$. In this paper, we examine how the value of $J_{\rm crit}$ varies as we vary the strength of a hypothetical high-redshift X-ray background. We confirm earlier findings that when the X-ray flux $J_{\rm X}$ is large, the critical UV flux scales as $J_{\rm crit} \propto J_{\rm X}^{1/2}$. We also carefully explore possible sources of uncertainty arising from how the X-rays are modelled. We use a reaction-based reduction technique to analyze the chemistry of H$_{2}$ in the X-ray illuminated gas and identify a critical subset of 35 chemical reactions that must be included in our chemical model in order to predict $J_{\rm crit}$ accurately. We further show that $J_{\rm crit}$ is insensitive to the details of how secondary ionization or He$^{+}$ recombination are modelled, but does depend strongly on the assumptions made regarding the column density of the collapsing gas.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.