Paper detail

Simulating the Carbon Footprint of Galactic Halos

We compare simulations, including the Illustris simulations, to observations of CIV and CII absorption at z=2-4. These are the CIV column density distribution function in the column density range $10^{12} - 10^{15}$ cm$^{-2}$, the CIV equivalent width distribution at 0.1 - 2 Å, and the covering fractions and equivalent widths of CIV 1548 and CII 1337 around DLAs. In the context of the feedback models we investigate, all CIV observations favour the use of more energetic wind models, which are better able to enrich the gas surrounding halos. We propose two ways to achieve this; an increased wind velocity and an increase in wind thermal energy. However, even our most energetic wind models do not produce enough absorbers with CIV equivalent width > 0.6 Å, which in our simulations are associated with the most massive haloes. All simulations are in reasonable agreement with the CII covering fraction and equivalent widths around Damped Lyman-$α$ absorbers, although there is a moderate deficit in one bin 10 - 100 kpc from the DLA. Finally, we show that the CIV in our simulations is predominantly photoionized.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.