Paper detail

Simulating protostellar evolution and radiative feedback in the cluster environment

Radiative feedback is among the most important consequences of clustered star formation inside molecular clouds. At the onset of star formation, radiation from massive stars heats the surrounding gas, which suppresses the formation of many low-mass stars. When simulating pre-main-sequence stars, their stellar properties must be defined by a prestellar model. Different approaches to prestellar modeling may yield quantitatively different results. In this paper, we compare two existing prestellar models under identical initial conditions to gauge whether the choice of model has any significant effects on the final population of stars. The first model treats stellar radii and luminosities with a ZAMS model, while separately estimating the accretion luminosity by interpolating to published prestellar tracks. The second, more accurate prestellar model self-consistently evolves the radius and luminosity of each star under highly variable accretion conditions. Each is coupled to a raytracing-based radiative feedback code that also treats ionization. The impact of the self-consistent model is less ionizing radiation and less heating during the early stages of star formation. This may affect final mass distributions. We noted a peak stellar mass reduced by 8% from 47.3 Msun to 43.5 Msun in the evolutionary model, relative to the track-fit model. Also, the difference in mass between the two largest stars in each case is reduced from 14 Msun to 7.5 Msun. The HII regions produced by these massive stars were also seen to flicker on timescales down to the limit imposed by our timestep (< 560 years), rapidly changing in size and shape, confirming previous cluster simulations using ZAMS-based estimates for prestellar ionizing flux.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.