Paper detail

Simulating gamma-ray binaries with a relativistic extension of RAMSES

Gamma-ray binaries are composed of a massive star and a rotation-powered pulsar with a highly relativistic wind. The collision between the winds from both objects creates a shock structure where particles are accelerated, resulting in the observed high energy emission. We study the impact of special relativity on the structure and stability of the colliding wind region and highlight the differences with colliding winds from massive stars. We focus on evolution with increasing values of the Lorentz factor of the pulsar wind, keeping in mind that current simulations are unable to reach the expected values of the pulsar wind Lorentz factors by orders of magnitude. We use high resolution numerical simulations with a relativistic extension to the hydrodynamics code RAMSES we have developed. Using 2D simulations, we focus on the region close to the binary, neglecting orbital motion. We use different values of the Lorentz factor of the pulsar wind, up to 16. We find analytic scaling relations between stellar wind collisions and gamma-ray binaries. They provide the position of the contact discontinuity. The position of the shocks strongly depends on the Lorentz factor, the relativistic wind is more collimated than expected based on non-relativistic simulations. Beyond a certain distance, the shocked flow is accelerated to its initial velocity and follows adiabatic expansion. We provide guidance for extrapolation towards more realistic values of the Lorentz factor of the pulsar wind. We extended the adaptive mesh refinement code RAMSES to relativistic hydrodynamics. This code is suited for the study of astrophysical objects such as pulsar wind nebulae, gamma-ray bursts or relativistic jets and will be part of the next public release of RAMSES. Using this code we performed simulations of gamma-ray binaries, highlighting the limits and possibilities of current hydrodynamic models of such systems.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.