Paper detail

Simulating galaxy evolution with a non-universal stellar initial mass function

We consider that the stellar initial mass function (IMF) depends on physical properties of star-forming molecular clouds in galaxies and thereby investigate how such a non-universal IMF (NUIMF) influences galaxy evolution. We incorporate a NUIMF model into galaxy-scale chemodynamical simulations in order to investigate the differences in chemical and dynamical evolution of disk galaxies between the NUIMF and universal IMF (UIMF) models. In the adopted NUIMF model, the three slopes of the Kroupa IMF depend independently on densities and metallicities ([Fe/H]) of molecular gas clouds, and production rates of metals and dust from massive and AGB stars can vary according to the time evolution of the three IMF slopes. The preliminary results of the simulations are as follows. Star formation rates in actively star-forming disk galaxies can be significantly lower in the NUIMF model than in the UIMF model, and the differences between the two models can be more remarkable in galaxies with higher SFRs. Chemical enrichment can proceed more rapidly in the NUIMF model and [Mg/Fe] for a given metallicity is higher in the NUIMF model. The evolution of H2 fraction (f_H2) and dust-to-gas ratio (D) is more rapid in the NUIMF model so that the final f_H2 and $D$ can be higher in the NUIMF model. Formation of massive stellar clumps in gas-rich disks is more strongly suppressed owing to the stronger SN feedback effect in the NUIMF model. The radial density profiles of new stars within the central 1kpc are shallower in the NUIMF model.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.