Paper detail

Simulated vs. observed UV emission at high redshift: a hint for a clumpy ISM?

We discuss the rest-frame UV emission between 5< z < 7 from the MareNostrum High-z Universe, a SPH simulation done with more than 2 billion particles. Cosmological simulations of galaxy formation generally overpredict the UV restframe luminosity function at high redshift, both at the bright and faint ends. In this Letter we explore a dust attenuation model where a larger extinction is applied to star populations younger than a given age, mimicking the effect of a clumpy interstellar medium. We show that this scenario fits reasonably well both the UV luminosity functions and the UV-continuum slopes derived from observations. The model assumes a large obscuration for stars younger than 25 Myr from the gas clouds where they should be embedded at their formation time. We find that the optical depth in these clouds should be between 30 and 100 times larger than the mean optical depth for the homogeneous part of the interstellar medium. These values are one order of magnitude larger than those estimated in local galaxies. Therefore, we conclude that LambdaCDM predictions for the high-z UV emission can accommodate the current observations if we consider a dust extinction model based on the assumption of a clumpy environment at high redshift.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.