Paper detail

Simulated Navier-Stokes trefoil reconnection

The evolution and self-reconnection of a perturbed trefoil vortex knot is simulated, then compared to recent experimental measurements (Scheeler et al. 2014a). Qualitative comparisons using three-dimensional vorticity isosurfaces and lines, then quantitative comparisons using the helicity. To have a single initial reconnection, as in the experiments, the trefoil is perturbed by 4 weak vortex rings. Initially there is a long period with deformations similar to the experiment during which the energy, continuum helicity and topological self-linking number are all preserved. In the next period, once reconnection has clearly begun, a Reynolds number independent fraction of the initial helicity is dissipated in a finite time. In contrast, the experimental analysis finds that the helicity inferred from the trajectories of hydrogen bubbles is preserved during reconnection. Since vortices reconnect gradually in a classical fluid, it is suggested that the essential difference is in the interpretation of the reconnection timescales associated with the observed events. Both the time when reconnection begins, and when it ends. Supporting evidence for the strong numerical helicity depletion is provided by spectra, a profile and visualisations of the helicity that show the formation of negative helicity on the periphery of the trefoil. A single case with the same trajectory and circulation, but a thinner core, replicates this helicity depletion despite larger Sobolev norms, showing that the reconnection timescale is determined by the initial trajectory and circulation of the trefoil, not the initial vorticity. This case also shows that the very small viscosity, $ν\rightarrow 0$ mathematical restrictions upon finite-time dissipative behavior do not apply to this range of modest viscosities.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.