Paper detail

Simplification of QPLDA: A practical method to the correction for the LDA band gap problem

It is necessary to employ quasi-particle calculations to correct band gap problems in LDA. As an expedient way for the reliable but massive GWA, Quasi-Particle-LDA (QPLDA) is proposed by several authors, where the total computational cost scales with N. Historically, Sham and Kohn introduced the idea of the local mass operator based on local wavenumber similar to WKB, but did not execute actual numerical calculations. They took into account exchange interaction only, from which we could not expect precise treatments anyway. Later, Pickett and Wang had proposed a more qualitative method and had shown its potentiality in examples of semiconductors, such as silicon, diamond and GaP. They used a model analytic formula for the dialectic function and adopted a model energy dispersion, which is free-electron like one, except that, being accompanied with an artificial band-gap discontinuity. The latter method has two shortcomings. First, to execute the calculation, several parameters are needed, such as the macroscopic dielectric constant and the band gap, which should be evaluated by the calculation itself, rather than being prepared as parameters. Second, in their computation of the mass operator, two or three dimensional numerical integrations are needed on each point of the direct space mesh, which demand large computational costs in iterative procedures in determining local wavenumbers and quasi-particle energies. This may be the reason why QPLDA has not been widely used until now. The present work proposes a qualitative way of QPLDA which does not need any experimental parameters, being much speedier than the formalism of Picket and Wang, and more precise than that of Sham and Kohn. The computational method adopted by the present work is a modification of the original proposal by Sham and Kohn, rather than that of Picket and Wang.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.