Paper detail

Simple Reductions from Formula-SAT to Pattern Matching on Labeled Graphs and Subtree Isomorphism

The CNF formula satisfiability problem (CNF-SAT) has been reduced to many fundamental problems in P to prove tight lower bounds under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). Recently, the works of Abboud, Hansen, Vassilevska W. and Williams (STOC 16), and later, Abboud and Bringmann (ICALP 18) have proposed basing lower bounds on the hardness of general boolean formula satisfiability (Formula-SAT). Reductions from Formula-SAT have two advantages over the usual reductions from CNF-SAT: (1) conjectures on the hardness of Formula-SAT are arguably much more plausible than those of CNF-SAT, and (2) these reductions give consequences even for logarithmic improvements in a problems upper bounds. Here we give tight reductions from Formula-SAT to two more problems: pattern matching on labeled graphs (PMLG) and subtree isomorphism. Previous reductions from Formula-SAT were to sequence alignment problems such as Edit Distance, LCS, and Frechet Distance and required some technical work. This paper uses ideas similar to those used previously, but in a decidedly simpler setting, helping to illustrate the most salient features of the underlying techniques.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.