Paper detail

Simple Multi-Party Set Reconciliation

As users migrate information to cloud storage, many distributed cloud-based services use multiple loosely consistent replicas of user information to avoid the high overhead of more tightly coupled synchronization. Periodically, the information must be synchronized, or reconciled. One can place this problem in the theoretical framework of {\em set reconciliation}: two parties $A_1$ and $A_2$ each hold a set of keys, named $S_1$ and $S_2$ respectively, and the goal is for both parties to obtain $S_1 \cup S_2$. Typically, set reconciliation is interesting algorithmically when sets are large but the set difference $|S_1-S_2|+|S_2-S_1|$ is small. In this setting the focus is on accomplishing reconciliation efficiently in terms of communication; ideally, the communication should depend on the size of the set difference, and not on the size of the sets. In this paper, we extend recent approaches using Invertible Bloom Lookup Tables (IBLTs) for set reconciliation to the multi-party setting. In this setting there are three or more parties $A_1,A_2,\ldots,A_n$ holding sets of keys $S_1,S_2,\ldots,S_n$ respectively, and the goal is for all parties to obtain $\cup_i S_i$. This could of course be done by pairwise reconciliations, but we seek more effective methods. Our methodology uses network coding techniques in conjunction with IBLTs, allowing efficiency in network utilization along with efficiency obtained by passing messages of size $O(|\cup_i S_i - \cap_i S_i|)$. Further, our approach can function even if the number of parties is not exactly known in advance, and in many cases can be used to determine which parties contain keys not in the joint union. By connecting reconciliation with network coding, we can allow for substantially more efficient reconciliation methods that apply to a number of natural distributed computing problems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.