Paper detail

Simple Mass Estimate for Resonance(s) being 6 Top plus 6 Anti top Bound states and Combinations thereof

We have long speculated \cite{1nbs,2nbs,3nbs,4nbs,5nbs, 6nbs,7nbs,8nbs,9nbs,10nbs,11nbs,12nbs, 13nbs,14nbs,LNvacuumstability} , that 6 top + 6 anti-top quarks due to the realtively large size of the top-yukawa coupling would bind exceptionaly strongly by mainly Higgs exchange. Here we present a surprisingly simple "calculation" of the mass of this speculated bound state. Even a possible resonance in scattering of two such bound states is speculated. For the "calculation" of the masses it is crucial to assume, that our since long speculated principle "Multiple Point Principle"\cite{5mp,6mp,7mp,8mp,9mp,10mp, 11mp,12mp,13mp,14mp,15mp,16mp,17mp, deriving}, is true. This principle says: {\em there are several vacua all having almost zero energy density}. Further we make an approximation of the Higgs Yukawa potential essentially replacing the exponential in it by a step-function. The new result means that there are now two independent calls for our bound state having the mass around 750 GeV required by our "new law of nature" the Multiple Point Principle. It should be remarked that in our picture there is {\em no new physics} in the sense of new fundamental particles, but the "Multiple Point Principle" is new in the sense of being not yet accepted. Further we get the {\em same} mass within uncertainties as earlier\cite{LNvacuumstability} but now from a completly different assumption, except for being from our "multiple point principle". But the two masses are gotten from using {\em different} (speculative) vacua occuring in the pure Standard Model.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.