Paper detail

Simple and Fast Rounding Algorithms for Directed and Node-weighted Multiway Cut

In Directed Multiway Cut(Dir-MC) the input is an edge-weighted directed graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set of $k$ terminal nodes $\{s_1,s_2,\ldots,s_k\} \subseteq V$; the goal is to find a min-weight subset of edges whose removal ensures that there is no path from $s_i$ to $s_j$ for any $i \neq j$. In Node-weighted Multiway Cut(Node-MC) the input is a node-weighted undirected graph $G$ and a set of $k$ terminal nodes $\{s_1,s_2,\ldots,s_k\} \subseteq V$; the goal is to remove a min-weight subset of nodes to disconnect each pair of terminals. Dir-MC admits a $2$-approximation [Naor, Zosin '97] and Node-MC admits a $2(1-\frac{1}{k})$-approximation [Garg, Vazirani, Yannakakis '94], both via rounding of LP relaxations. Previous rounding algorithms for these problems, from nearly twenty years ago, are based on careful rounding of an "optimum" solution to an LP relaxation. This is particularly true for Dir-MC for which the rounding relies on a custom LP formulation instead of the natural distance based LP relaxation [Naor, Zosin '97]. In this paper we describe extremely simple and near linear-time rounding algorithms for Dir-MC and Node-MC via a natural distance based LP relaxation. The dual of this relaxation is a special case of the maximum multicommodity flow problem. Our algorithms achieve the same bounds as before but have the significant advantage in that they can work with "any feasible" solution to the relaxation. Consequently, in addition to obtaining "book" proofs of LP rounding for these two basic problems, we also obtain significantly faster approximation algorithms by taking advantage of known algorithms for computing near-optimal solutions for maximum multicommodity flow problems. We also investigate lower bounds for Dir-MC when $k=2$ and in particular prove that the integrality gap of the LP relaxation is $2$ even in directed planar graphs.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.